English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aggressive discipline strategies are related to negative outcomes for children. Understanding who might use aggressive discipline offers an opportunity for early prevention. Part of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) posits that attitudes and intentions to engage in a behavior predict engagement in the behavior. A partial TPB framework was applied to assess relations among attitudes and intentions to use aggressive discipline strategies in pre-parents. Participants’ ( N  = 247) experienced aggressive discipline, perceived acceptability of these strategies, and intention to use these strategies were assessed. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor model comprised of aggressive discipline experienced and aggressive discipline attitudes (i.e., acceptability and intentions), supporting the use of a partial TPB framework in this area. Results suggest that attitudes and intentions may not be empirically distinct for pre-parents speculating hypothetical situations. Moreover, results suggest that pre-parents may be a viable population for early prevention efforts for aggressive discipline.

Are pre-parent aggressive discipline acceptability and intentions unique constructs? Latent modeling with the theory of planned behavior