English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Although media response to the  Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization  decision was widespread in the United States, the extent to which people were aware of the Mississippi law leading to the decision, the  Dobbs v. Jackson  case, is unclear, as are the resulting effects of the decision on legal abortion. As such, we examined people’s awareness of abortion legality prior to and after the  Dobbs v. Jackson  decision announcement, as well as the potential implications associated with the decision (i.e. overturning of  Roe v. Wade ). We also examined people’s attitudes toward abortion legality, specifically focusing on 15 weeks’ gestation to correspond with the Mississippi law that led to  Dobbs v. Jackson . Data were collected across two studies at different times. In Study 1, a 15-minute survey was administered to IPSOS’ KnowledgePanel ( N  = 1014) prior to the decision announcement. A shorter version of that survey was administered to a second sample using NORC’s AmeriSpeak Omnibus panel ( N  = 1002). Nearly half of that sample (42.2%) completed the survey prior to the decision announcement. People were generally unaware of the Mississippi law, the  Dobbs v. Jackson  case, and implications associated with the decision (e.g. overturning  Roe v. Wade ). People generally endorsed abortion being legal at 15 weeks or later, but this varied by circumstance. We did not find meaningful effects of the decision announcement on people’s knowledge and attitudes. Our findings suggest that the intense response to the decision from the media and people involved in the abortion movement may not represent the general public’s reaction.

People’s knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the Dobbs v. Jackson decision