English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We disentangle whether students who believe they know about campus reporting avenues and procedures for addressing sexual misconduct are able to correctly respond to factually – based knowledge statements related to procedures and reporting. Data from a climate survey administered at one university were analyzed to explore how well students’ perceptions of their knowledge about university sexual misconduct reporting and procedures match with their responses to factually – based knowledge statements (i.e., mandatory reporting, investigations, confidential resources, and accommodations for survivors). Many students who say they know about university reporting and procedures correctly respond to the factually – based statements. However, anywhere between one in five to one in three students responded incorrectly, and thus, have a disconnect between their perceived knowledge and factual knowledge. Implications for the inclusion of questions in climate surveys and future research are discussed. It is important to ensure students have a comprehensive understanding of campus reporting and procedures for addressing sexual misconduct as universities continue to respond to experiences of the campus community.

College Students Knowledge of Policies, Procedures, and Reporting Options for Sexual Violence: Gaps, Disconnects, and Suggestions for Moving Forward