English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between mentorship and MSW students’ use of the evidence-based practice (EBP) process. Using a sample of MSW students (N = 203), general structural equation modeling and independent samples t-tests were conducted. We found, compared to not having a mentor, having a mentor was positively associated with students’ use of the EBP process. However, compared to not having a mentor, having a mentor was not associated with students’ scores on using two steps in the process (finding relevant evidence and evaluating practice outcomes) but was associated with higher scores, on average, with three steps (formulating research questions, critically appraising literature, and integrating evidence into practice). This exploratory study suggests that as MSW programs strive to promote the use of research in practice, mentorship efforts may be needed to emphasize the use of the EBP process.

The Evidence-Based Practice Process: The Importance of Mentorship