English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

RATIONALE: Quality management standards are available for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but how often they are followed in community settings is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: We sought to measure the adherence to standard quality of care criteria for COPD management in primary care using primary care electronic medical records as an indicator for quality of COPD management. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using EMR data from Ontario and previously validated set of COPD quality indicators previously developed by the Ontario COPD Population Health Network. We analyzed how often the COPD quality indicators were met for patients with COPD at the population-level and at the family physician-level. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Five quality indicators were assessed at population- and family physician (FP)-levels. We included 6995 patients with COPD under care of 247 FPs. The highest performing quality indicator was the recording of patients’ smoking history in the EMR. FPs varied in their rates of provision of smoking cessation support to current smokers, recording of spirometry, administration of pneumococcal and seasonal influenza vaccines. Five additional health care or medication utilization rates were assessed for all patients with COPD regardless of disease severity, including prescriptions for short-acting and long-acting bronchodilators, combined inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators, evidence of pulmonary rehabilitation and oxygen therapy use. CONCLUSION: EMR data can be a useful data source to study COPD care, and there are opportunities for improvement in several areas of COPD management in primary care as well as standardization of EMR use for COPD care.

Measuring chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) quality indicators using primary care electronic medical records (EMRs) in Ontario, Canada