English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Many physical education teacher education (PETE) programs have adopted FITNESSGRAM® as the preferred method to assess teacher candidate fitness levels. The rationale, however, is unclear. This article presents fitness testing results of PETE candidates using FITNESSGRAM® with the aim to evaluate its appropriateness. 86 PETE students participated in the FITNESSGRAM® assessment tool as part of the University program course requirement. Participants engaged in the Progressive Aerobic Capacity Endurance Run (PACER), push-ups, curl-ups, the sit and reach, and body composition was determined via body mass index (BMI). Data were analyzed separately by sex. Compared to FITNESSGRAM® Healthy Fitness Zones, most participants met or exceeded the muscular and cardiovascular fitness testing components; however, many were also calculated as overweight or obese. Despite the wide use of FITNESSGRAM® in PETE programs, there are concerns with the psychometric properties of some FITNESSGRAM® scales relative to the PETE candidate population. The authors recommend age-appropriate fitness testing measures to ensure that pre-service physical education teachers are engaged in fitness producing activities that adequately assess and promote health-related fitness.

The Use of FITNESSGRAM® in PETE: Is It Appropriate?