English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Safe-to-Fail (SF) is an emerging resilient design approach that envisions potential failure scenarios while designing infrastructure systems. This study aims to establish the relative weightage of the SF criteria, and, to construct a ranking of the commonly employed flood mitigation alternatives within the context of coastal flood resilience. In pursuit of these goals, this research identifies SF criteria documented in existing literature and catalogs typically used coastal flood solutions. Then, the study surveys the professionals from the Department of Transportation (DOT) and leverages a multi-criteria decision-making approach to assess the responses and develop the intended ranking. The findings highlight that robustness is the highest weighted SF criteria and ecosystem restoration is the highest-ranked SF flood solution closely followed by green infrastructure (GI). These findings provide valuable insights for decision-makers of infrastructure development in coastal cities and support them to embrace SF design strategies for developing resilient built environments.

Multi-criteria evaluation of Safe-to-Fail flood solution alternatives for developing resilient coastal cities