English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Transport infrastructure critically influences how people live their lives, structuring mobility and mediating access to the resources central to health and wellbeing. While the links between infrastructure, mobility and wellbeing are well established, much less is known about how these relationships are contingent on socio-economic, cultural, and bodily diversity, and the characteristics of local ecologies. Here, we firstly ask, how does transport infrastructure shape mobility opportunities for people living in diverse circumstances? Secondly, what are the impacts of inequitable access to mobility for wellbeing? Drawing from research across four sites in Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland), Aotearoa New Zealand, we consider the experiences of older- and disabled- or bodily-diverse people from varied ethnic groups living across a range of socio-economic circumstances. We use community-based participatory research methods, including ‘go-along’ interviews, focus groups and interactive workshops, to engage communities least heard at policy or strategic levels. Their experiences illustrate firstly, that urban infrastructure tends to further marginalise the already marginalised, and secondly, that people draw on different and unequal resources to negotiate infrastructural marginalisation, resulting in unequally patterned vulnerabilities and a system that entrenches the status quo. Our findings indicate the need to consider intersectionality in transport consultation and design.

Inequitable mobilities: intersections of diversity with urban infrastructure influence mobility, health and wellbeing