English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This is a commentary on Adair and Lozano’s (2022) article “Adaptive Choice: Psychological Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Freedom.” Here, I acknowledge the possibilities for the normalization of abortion that their approach presents. Then, drawing predominantly from South African politics and scholarship, I address how the (future) stories we tell about abortion may limit the potential for normalization and the eradication of stigma. I argue that scholars and activists need to  engender  a more radical, intersectional, and therefore critically reflexive, inclusive, bold abortion justice politics that envisions itself as one necessary part of the larger struggle for reproductive justice.

Engendering a Radical Abortion (Justice) Politics: The Struggle for Reproductive Freedom and Justice