English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This is a commentary on Adair and Lozano’s (2022) article “Adaptive Choice: Psychological Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Freedom.” Here I question the utility and appropriateness of one of the psychological perspectives offered: evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary psychology has often been critiqued by feminist scholars for its reification of traditional gender roles, including the stereotype that women are inherently maternal. A more nuanced view, such as biosocial constructionist theory, may be better suited to answering the questions Adair and Lozano suggest that researchers address.

Is Evolutionary Psychology Theory Appropriate for Abortion Research?