English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

There are many factors outlined in the signal processing pipeline that impact brain–computer interface (BCI) performance, but some methodological factors do not depend on signal processing. Nevertheless, there is a lack of research assessing the effect of such factors. Here, we investigate the impact of VR, immersiveness, age, and spatial resolution on the classifier performance of a Motor Imagery (MI) electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI in naïve participants. We found significantly better performance for VR compared to non-VR (15 electrodes: VR 77.48 ± 6.09%, non-VR 73.5 ± 5.89%, p = 0.0096; 12 electrodes: VR 73.26 ± 5.2%, non-VR 70.87 ± 4.96%, p = 0.0129; 7 electrodes: VR 66.74 ± 5.92%, non-VR 63.09 ± 8.16%, p = 0.0362) and better performance for higher electrode quantity, but no significant differences were found between immersive and non-immersive VR. Finally, there was not a statistically significant correlation found between age and classifier performance, but there was a direct relation found between spatial resolution (electrode quantity) and classifier performance (r = 1, p = 0.0129, VR; r = 0.99, p = 0.0859, non-VR).

Impact of age, VR, immersion, and spatial resolution on classifier performance for a MI-based BCI