English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Science has contributed to improving and transforming conservation in many different ways such that conservation might be understood as a scientific activity in itself, or at least as a science-driven activity. However, there are both theoretical and practical problems with any such belief including things like the limits of inductive knowledge, the unrepresentativeness of samples and the disjunction of reality inherent to the scientific paradigm. Perhaps more importantly, there are many areas in conservation practice that fall beyond the purview of science as they can only be successfully approached by resorting to a kind of knowledge (or intuition, or skill) that is unique to conservators. The relevance of this knowledge can be demonstrated by carefully examining the questions that a practising conservator needs to answer when performing a conservation treatment.

Conservation science, conservation practice and the conservator’s knowledge: a naïve exploration