English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It is well known that various human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes are present in semen specimens. Also, it has been demonstrated that sperm parameters are negatively affected when HPV infection is present in the sperm sample. Besides all these, the effect of cryopreservation on HPV sensitivity and resistance is not known. The aim of the present study is to evaluate first the prevalence of HPV and secondly to elucidate whether cryopreservation of sperm HPV-positive samples has any effect on the viability of HPV. For this purpose, a cohort of 78 sperm specimens was used from a respective number of patients. After giving informed consent, semen analysis was performed. Each sperm sample was divided into four equal aliquots. The first one (fresh) was evaluated for the prevalence of HPV, while the other three aliquots were cryopreserved by adding an equal quantity of cryoprotectant and plunged into the LN. Each of the three aliquots was thawed 3, 6, and 12 months later, respectively, so as to evaluate whether there is a time-resistance period of HPV prevalence. HPV infection was found to be in eleven sperm samples, demonstrating a 14.1% (11/78) HPV prevalence. Among the HPV-positive samples, six of them were high-risk and the remaining were low-risk genotypes. Moreover, the high-risk fresh samples demonstrated higher motility values than the low-risk samples (60% ± 2.7 vs 45.6% ± 3.7,  p  &lt; .05), while semen volume in the high-risk samples was significantly lower than the respective volume in the low-risk samples (2.26 ± 0.2ml vs 3.5 ± 0.6ml,  p  &lt; .05). Interestingly, cryopreservation of the HPV-positive samples resulted in the sustainability and time-resistance of HPV in all high-risk HPV-positive samples, something that was not the case with the low-risk HPV-positive samples. Conclusively, sperm samples infected with high-risk HPV, demonstrate lower sperm parameters and time-resistance activity during cryopreservation.

The impact of cryopreservation on both sperm HPV-negative and positive subtypes