English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Coal plays a major role in the economic development of many countries, especially in metallurgical industries and conventional power generation plants. The removal of sulfur from coal has recently become even more critically important. Existence of sulfur compounds in coal limits its industrial applications due to environmental as well as technical problems. Thus, high sulfur coal is usually upgraded by desulfurization through physical, chemical, and biotechnological processes. In this study, lowering of pyritic sulfur took place after thermal treatment at 500–700°C (pyrolysis) using a wet high-intensity magnetic separation process. The samples were subjected to size reduction to −25 µm and characterized with X-ray diffraction (XRD), proximate and ultimate analysis, and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Then, the experiments were performed based on central composite rotatable design (CCRD) and response surface methodology (RSM) after thermal treatment of coal containing 3.30% total sulfur. Statistical analysis was performed to examine the significance of the effect of different operating parameters. A maximum sulfur rejection of 90.10% with the lowest sulfur content of 0.59 was obtained at 8.38% solid concentration, 4.59 g/min feed rate, and 7810 gauss magnetic field intensity. The confirmation tests at the optimum conditions produced 0.54–0.56% total sulfur with 90.25–92.33% sulfur rejection.

Separation of pyritic sulfur from ultrafine coal by pyrolysis & wet high magnetic separation