English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The investigation compared the development between Chinese and American Division III tennis student-athletes to explore. In doing so, we aimed to provide a reproducible way of promoting Chinese collegiate tennis by complementing or mimicking the American experience. In this case study, the researchers used triangulation, including qualitative methods (eight semi-structured interviews, including six tennis student-athletes and two head coaches), comparison, and observation to increase the validity and reliability of the data. A noticeable difference between the two groups was that, compared to the U.S., the Chinese tennis student-athletes did not pay much attention to academics, the coaches lacked effective strategies for team management, and the training and competition mechanisms were not reasonable enough. However, there were some similarities across the two groups, including women student-athletes generally performed better than men, the goals of both developmental programs met respective basic requirements, and the coaches were successful in the recruitment of student-athletes.

The development of division III tennis student-athletes: A comparison of Chinese and American colleges