English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Weather-related natural disasters such as hurricanes are becoming more severe and more frequent due to human-induced climate change. Small Island Developing States are particularly vulnerable to such events. These extreme events have economic impacts on people’s lives but are also associated with non-economic losses (NELs) that are not easily quantifiable. The United Nations Convention Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has tasked the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage to find ways to ‘address’ these losses. While the UNFCCC and literature identify NELs, these remain broad and high-level examples, potentially not applicable in local contexts. Therefore, international climate change policies that are developed to address NELs are at risk of being inadequate and might not address the needs of people affected. This paper addresses this research gap based on interviews with residents from the Caribbean islands Dominica and Barbuda who survived hurricanes Maria and Irma in 2017. Responses show that the categorization of NELs under the UNFCCC only partially aligns with those NELs identified by interviewees. Firstly, interviewees do not make a distinction between economic and non-economic losses and secondly the term ‘non-economic  loss ’ is best expressed as ‘non-economic  impact ’ in order to encapsulate the full breadth of NELs. Both terms should jointly be considered as fulfilling ‘life-functions’. HIGHLIGHTSThe UNFCCC categories are not reflective enough of the broad range of non-economic losses (NEL) that exist.‘Non-economic  loss ’ should be re-framed to ‘non-economic  impact ’ as a loss does not encapsulate the full breadth of losses identified by intervieweesAnother category for NELs is required as people do not always distinguish between economic and non-economic losses when economic items fulfil a  life functionThe findings are detrimental for effective international and national policymaking The UNFCCC categories are not reflective enough of the broad range of non-economic losses (NEL) that exist. ‘Non-economic  loss ’ should be re-framed to ‘non-economic  impact ’ as a loss does not encapsulate the full breadth of losses identified by interviewees Another category for NELs is required as people do not always distinguish between economic and non-economic losses when economic items fulfil a  life function The findings are detrimental for effective international and national policymaking

Re-framing non-economic losses to non-economic impacts for effective policymaking: evidence from the Caribbean