English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper considers how representations of the Holocaust – what is labeled Holocaust institutionalization – have been critiqued and even condemned in literary texts. Rather than exploring the Holocaust, and the corollaries of memory, identity, Second Generation inherited trauma, and other concerns, this body of literature considers the integrity, decency and purpose of Holocaust projects. Mainly it looks at the way aspects of Holocaust institutionalization are morally suspect, exploitive and counter to meaningful engagement with Holocaust history in the writings of Mordecai Richler. Then, as a counterpoint it examines Hope by Shalom Auslander and Nathan Englander’s 2012 short story, ‘What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank,’ which traffic in moral inquiries into assumptions about Holocaust institutionalization.

Transgressive post-Holocaust narratives: Mordecai Richler to Nathan Englander