English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This perspective piece discusses inconsistencies in assistive technology (AT) language as a barrier to communication in AT provision, research, development, trade, and policy. The imperative to improve communication is explored in relation to AT stakeholder endeavours. This commentary is a call for action to develop a terminology standard through the aggregation of evidence-based concepts and terms to inform and optimize stakeholder outcomes.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONStandardized terminology supports the gathering, aggregation, analysis, and interpretation of valid data and the development of tools used for needs and outcomes assessment.Standardized terminology also supports effective and efficient documentation, practice, collaboration, and capacity building by stakeholders in both national and international contexts. Standardized terminology supports the gathering, aggregation, analysis, and interpretation of valid data and the development of tools used for needs and outcomes assessment. Standardized terminology also supports effective and efficient documentation, practice, collaboration, and capacity building by stakeholders in both national and international contexts.

Standard terminology is critical to advancing rehabilitation and assistive technology: a call to action