English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Promoting evidence-based treatments and the human rights of people living with mental illness are the two pillars of Global Mental Health (GMH). Critics counter that human rights narratives must also include social justice frameworks. We draw on the cases of autism and ADHD in Brazil to discuss the role of human rights in mental health in the context of GMH. A human rights perspective involves citizenship rights for individuals living with mental distress and provides a framework to problematise the logic of GMH centred on individual rights and rights to treatment. We begin with an overview on human rights discussions in GMH and examine the introduction of human rights discourses in the Brazilian psychiatric reform. We then explore how autism and ADHD became priorities of GMH interventions as well as the constitution of two styles of activism and mobilisation of human rights around these conditions. One follows the universal public health logic and promotes health as a social right. The other follows the logic of parents’ associations that redefined those conditions as forms of disability to advocate for specialised services and interventions. Finally, we discuss these forms of human rights mobilisation and their implications for Brazilian mental health and GMH.

Negotiating human rights narratives in Global Mental Health: Autism and ADHD controversies in Brazil