English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Positionality statements, or statements acknowledging relevant background, context, and situatedness of researcher positions and identities are widely used in qualitative research. In recent years, public claims of insider status have been contested by the communities in question, often popularized in mainstream media. This article explores the complexities and factors that influence the way researchers think about their own positionality in relation to their participants, using written reflections on race and positional dynamics, as well as relevant literature. Through this article, I explore these complexities and the underlying motivations that compel me to present my location, identity, or positionality in particular ways. These reflections are valuable for provoking critical reflection about the way we interpret our own identities in relation to one another, and the reasons we may do so.

Race, relational dynamics and anxious adjustments: the complexities of identities in relation to one another