English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Prior studies find that insiders facing pledging risks pass up risky projects to preserve their private benefits of control. However, we find that firms with controlling shareholders’ share pledges (CSSP) tend to initiate mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As), which signal good news and prevent the stock price from falling. This phenomenon is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) and firms with negative market responses on the announcement date of share pledges. Additionally, due to cost control considerations, a firm with CSSP will choose small-size targets and complete M&amp;As in a short time. Nevertheless, the long-term performance of such M&amp;As is worse.

Do insiders facing pledging risks make risky corporate investments? Evidence from Chinese M&As