English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Low impact developments (LIDs) are control measures to restore the hydrologic regime and enhance stormwater quality. Due to LID’s expensive capital and maintenance cost, the placement of LID controls in a watershed is an important planning task and still an open question in the specialized literature. This study proposes a simulation-optimization approach to place bioretention systems within a watershed to optimize their effectiveness. The Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) and the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGAIII) were coupled to identify the near-optimal locations of bioretentions for near-optimal quality and quantity controls, considering runoff volume, peak flow, total suspended solids, total nitrogen, and cost. Trade-offs were identified between cost versus other objective functions. The results suggest no specific spatial preference in placement of bioretentions under different rainfall regimes in watershed scale. However, in subcatchment scale, the near-optimal placement under single storm events is either maximum or none, while distributed under continuous simulation.

Exploring near-optimal locations for bioretention systems in catchment scale using many-objective evolutionary optimization