English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The permeability coefficient is the foundation of evaluating the clogging and maintenance. In this study, 384 field tests were carried out on 9 positions using single-ring and double-ring permeameters with different diameters. Both falling head and constant head methods were evaluated. At the same time, core samples were drilled from the 9 test positions, and their permeability coefficients were measured in the laboratory. The results show that there is a good correlation between falling head method and constant head method, both of them can be used to measure in-situ permeability coefficient of pervious pavement. Although the double-ring method can reduce the transverse seepage inside the pavement, the effect of double-ring permeameters with different cylinder diameters is different, and permeameters with larger cylinder diameters are better. For sites with permeability greater than 2 mm/s, it is not recommended to use permeameters with small cylinder diameters..

Evaluation of in-situ permeability measurement methods for pervious concrete pavement