English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Quantifying gas solubility in oil under reservoir conditions is essential in reservoir engineering. Several laboratory techniques have been suggested to quantify it; nevertheless, these procedures are characterized by their demanding time requirements and high costs. Estimating the solution gas-oil ratio relies significantly on applying mathematical and artificial intelligence models. The research commenced by collecting 757 datasets from published articles. Subsequently, the data was partitioned into two distinct categories: training and test data. Following this data preparation phase, artificial intelligence models, including Histogram Gradient Boosting Regression (HGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), were employed to model the solution gas-oil ratio. Additionally, the Memetic algorithm (MA) was employed to recompute the coefficients of the Petrosky and Farshad model, initially developed with 81 data points, using an expanded dataset of 605 training instances. Subsequently, model accuracy and performance were assessed through statistical and visual analyses. The results indicate that the HGBoost model performs best, achieving an overall R2 of 0.9886 and an overall RMSE of 41.29 scf/STB. Notably, among the mathematical models, the modified Petrosky and Farshad model stands out with an overall R2 of 0.9078 and an overall RMSE of 114.49 scf/STB. The Taylor diagram and violin plot both indicate that the HGBoost model and the modified Petrosky and Farshad model outperform other machine learning models and mathematical models, respectively. These results demonstrate the accuracy of the models described in this study.

Solution gas-oil ratio estimation using histogram gradient boosting regression, machine learning, and mathematical models: a comparative analysis