English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

CaL technology is a promising means for post-combustion CO 2  capture in already existing power plants, and heat integration is an effective way to lower the efficiency penalty caused by CO 2  capture. Three cases with different heat integration degree were investigated in the manuscript to predict the efficiency penalty and the specific energy consumption for CO 2  capture, aiming to find the optimum scheme of integrating capture unit into coal-fired power plant. The sensitivity analysis was also conducted to compare the impacts of key parameters. The simulation results show that the Case 3, which employs a variety of measures to improve the internal heat integration within CaL and reclaims the surplus released heat via an additional steam cycle, has the lowest efficiency penalty, 5.75%. It also indicates that heat integration in Case 3 results in a 14.4% of decrease in coal consumption, a 5.8% of reduction in power consumed by CO 2  compression process, a 13.6% of drop in power consumption in ASU, and a 31.5% of decrease in specific energy consumption for CO 2  capture. The sensitivity analysis shows that the efficiency penalty may be reduced by 0.011 percentage points for each degree decrease in temperature difference of MH-1. As the compression efficiency increases from 70% to 85%, the efficiency penalty decreases from 6.51% to 5.47%, and the specific energy consumption reduces from 2.21 MJ/kg CO 2  to 1.80 MJ/kg CO 2 . Abbreviations:  APH: Air Preheater; ASUL: Air Separation Unit; BFPT: Boiler Feedwater Pump Turbine; CaL: Calcium Looping; CCS: Carbon Capture and Sequestration; CFPP: Coal-Fired Power Plant; GSS: Gas-Solid Separator; HPC: High Pressure Column; HPEC: High Pressure Economizer; HPSH: High Pressure Super-Heater; HPST: High Pressure Steam Turbine; HRSG: Heat Recovery Steam Generator; IPEC: Intermediate Pressure Economizer; IPEV: Intermediate Pressure Evaporator; IPSH: Intermediate Pressure Super-Heater; LPST: Low Pressure Steam Turbine; LHV: Low Heat Value; LPC: Low Pressure Column; LPEC: Low Pressure Economizer; LPEV: Low Pressure Evaporator; ORC: Organic Rankine Cycle; RH: Reheater.

Performance Assessment of Coal Fired Power Plant Integrated with Calcium Looping CO2 Capture Process