English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this study, mathematical models of a novel mechanism, rhombic-drive, for a two-stroke, spark ignition (SI) engine, and a two-stroke SI engine with a conventional slider–crank mechanism were performed in MATLAB software. Their performances were compared with kinematic and thermodynamic analyses. Mathematical model was conducted according to real cycle approach and some of the operating parameters such as compression ratio, swept volume, heat release time, and lambda were kept identical for both engines. Pressure, volume, temperature, heat release, heat transfer coefficient, work, piston speed, and acceleration changes were examined. Maximum in-cylinder pressure was taken at 222°CA with 4,188 kPa for rhombic-drive engine while 190°CA with 4,003 kPa for slider–crank mechanism engine and maximum temperature was only 39 K higher for rhombic-drive mechanism engine. Theoretical thermal efficiencies of rhombic-drive and slider–crank mechanism were 31.14% and 31.87%, respectively. Effective power of rhombic-drive mechanism engine was 2.12 kW, whereas slider–crank mechanism engine was 2.17 kW. Mechanical efficiency of rhombic-drive engine was obtained 85.89%, while this was only 86.21% for slider–crank mechanism engine.

A thermodynamic comparison of rhombic-drive and slider–crank mechanisms for a two-stroke SI engine