English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author discusses a pair of articles exploring non-interpretative aspects of contemporary psychoanalytic work, Ofra Shapira-Berman’s “When Should We Not Interpret: The Analyst’s Transformative Act as a Vital Contribution to the Patient’s Sense of Being Real and Alive” and Bnaya Amid and Eytan Bachar’s “At-one-ment: Beyond Transference and Countertransference.” Aibel notes that these authors join a number of contemporary analysts exploring and codifying a shift in thinking about therapeutic action, which Ogden has described as a move from the epistemological to the ontological, from knowledge and understanding to experiencing and becoming. Among analysts of multiple theoretical orientations, a process “allowing the patient the experience of creatively discovering meaning for himself, and in that state of being, becoming more fully alive” today takes precedence over sharing insight. Abdicating a stance of knowledge about the unconscious in favor of co-creating moments of affective meeting is seen as central to facilitating clinical growth.

I Don’t Understand (Why Scrutinize the Inscrutable When We Can Un-Understand and Not-Know?)