English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Systematic review (SR) is a form of investigation that synthesizes existing evidence to provide statements of conclusion and helps guide decision-making in practicing evidence-based medicine. This study uses criteria adapted from PRISMA and AMSTAR2 to evaluate the quality of SRs published in a  flagship  journal of AAMC,  Academic Medicine (AM) , and an Open Access journal,  BioMed Central Medical Education (BMC) . Three authors analyzed 39 articles published in  AM  and  BMC  between 2020 and 2021. Evaluation of the two peer-reviewed journals focusing on medical education revealed that the quality of published SRs is not always consistent in following SR guidelines or standards.

Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews Published in Academic Medicine and BMC Medical Education