English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Identification of biomarkers is crucial in guiding the treatment decision and improving the future outcomes of DLBCL. The aim of the current study is to detect the biochemical and clinical impacts of miR-150 and miR-21 expression levels in DLBCL. Quantification of serum miR-150 and miR-21 expression levels by real-time PCR after micro-RNA extraction and RT-PCR. At a cutoff point of 2.3 for miR-21, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values for diagnosis of DLBCL were 98%, 90%, 90.7%, and 97.8%, respectively. At cut-off point (≤19.12) the sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive and negative predictive values of miR-21 to discriminate stage IV vs stage II DLBCL patients were 68.42%, 80%, 86.7%%,and 57.1%, respectively. Serum miR-150 and serum miR-21 can be used as diagnostic markers for DLBCL patients, but miR-21 is more sensitive than miR-150. Serum miR-21 can be used as prognostic marker for DLBCL patients. It was more sensitive and more specific than miR-150.

Biochemical and clinical impacts of miR-150 and miR-21 expression levels in diffuse large B cell lymphoma