English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Equivalence classes are typically established by teaching arbitrary conditional discriminations with discrete single stimuli as samples and comparisons. The current study was the first to use compound stimuli as both samples and comparisons during training of conditional relations. We compared compound-to-compound stimuli MTS training with the more typical single-to-single stimuli training to establish two 4-member arbitrary stimulus classes with adults. A pretest-train-posttest between-groups experimental design was used. Compounds consisted of side-by-side pairs of individual (single) abstract symbols. A pretest and posttest consisting of MTS trials evaluating all single-to-single, single-to-compound, compound-to-single, and compound-to-compound relations were used to compare the effectiveness of the two training procedures. In addition, participants sorted cards depicting all single stimuli into piles both before and after MTS training. Results showed that stimulus classes were established with similar accuracy regardless of the training used. However, the compound-to-compound group participants required significantly fewer trials and training blocks to demonstrate class emergence than participants in the single-to-single group. In addition, the compound-to-compound group participants emitted significantly fewer errors during MTS training. We discuss how these results may inform use of stimulus equivalence procedures in mainstream settings (e.g., teaching academic content).

Comparing compound pairs and single stimuli during match-to-sample to establish arbitrary stimulus classes with adults of typical development