English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

An optimised electrochemical technique, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in KOH solution (LSV-KOH) was confronted with the double loop electrochemical Potentiokinetic reactivation (DL-EPR) to verify which is the best technique to quantify deleterious phases (DP) in a UNS S32750 super duplex stainless steel. DL-EPR presented an error in determination of deleterious phases in the range of 6.9–100%. LSV-KOH show a better accuracy in quantification of deleterious phases volume fractions, the error range for LSV-KOH was 2.4–26.2%. When the morphology of sigma changes from lamellar to divorced, was observed modifications on LSV-KOH voltammograms. In specimens where lamellar morphology is present, the voltammograms show two peaks curve. Meanwhile, in specimens where occurred also divorced precipitation of sigma the voltammograms changes to a 3 peaks curve. This feature is due to the dissolution of sigma phase boundaries which has different compositions according to the form of sigma precipitation.

corrosion engineering, science and technology

DL-EPR vs. LSV-KOH: from simple detection of deleterious phases to analysis of morphology and high accuracy on determination of sigma phase in UNS S32750 stainless steel