English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article examines and compares strategies of international relations of three European cities – Amsterdam, Barcelona and Stockholm. Amsterdam was chosen due to its broad human rights agenda and friendly attitude towards migrants, Barcelona due to its innovative International Relations Master Plan, and Stockholm because of its long-term vision of  Stockholm for Everyone , which clearly takes a people-centered approach. The author attempts to answer the following research questions – which of the three strategies is the most developed one in human rights terms? Which is the most progressive and which propose something more or new rather than only recognize already existing human rights? Research methods include desk analysis, comparative analysis, critical analysis of literature and online interviews with representatives of the examined cities. As a result, the article shows the rising role of cities in implementing and promoting human rights and meeting the needs of their citizens which fall under the umbrella of people-centered approach.

Human rights approach in selected European municipal strategies of international relations