English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper presents a conceptual model that measures the knowledge growth and team-composition impact on the performance of a co-located software project. Inspiration for the development of the conceptual model is obtained from previous literature and focus-group-discussions. The model is validated with the help of the data obtained from two co-located software modules. A set of team-composition scenarios for different team knowledge-processing-abilities and team-seniority ratios are used to evaluate and compare the effect of the proposed model on a co-located team performance. The performance is measured in terms of total costs, extent of faulty-work and rework cost. It has been found that teams comprising of medium level of experience and medium-to-high knowledge-processing-ability provide good compromising solutions with lower total costs, less faulty-work and less cost of rework. The proposed model may act as a decision-support tool to the co-located software project managers during team composition in order to improve performance.

Impact of knowledge growth and team composition on the co-located software project performance