English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Knowledge management (KM) plays a critical role in management academia, yet relatively few articles endeavour to study the outcome of KM – knowledge management performance indicators (KMPI). After a thorough review, this study concludes five shortcomings from the prior literature. To overcome such shortcomings, this study employs the focus/breadth/content-process dimensions originating from  Contingency Perspective  to conduct an exploratory case study, develop a KMPI model, accordingly conduct an empirical survey, and employ statistical techniques to examine model reliability and validity. This study constructs the KMPI model with eight constructs: knowledge profundity, replication, dissemination, extension, diversity, expansion, convergence, and creation. The empirical evidence of the 30-item scale indicates that the scale presents good reliability, construct validity, and high criterion validity. The model and the scale provide new insights to the practical and academic efforts in KM performance issues.

Task characteristics and knowledge management performance: model development and scale construction