English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The paper engages in ‘paradigmatic talk’ about public outcomes of higher education (HE). We were drawn to this paradigmatic discussion because of its inherent ‘cultural’ dimensions and the opportunity for us to be self-reflexive about the ontological values underlying ‘cultures’ that shape the articulation, representation, and enactment of HE's public outcomes. While we agree with Marginson and Yang (forthcoming) that comparisons of public outcomes of HE across cultures are not neutral, we argue that such comparisons are rooted in and driven by ontological values and commitments. We offer an analysis of how our understandings of ‘public’ and ‘outcomes’ may shift when ontological commitments and values consider representations of culture, public, affect, and temporality.

What is in the observer? From thinking to being ‘public’ ‘outcomes’ of higher education