English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aims to identify how often families of periviable infants had a care plan stating whether to provide active or comfort care and how often the care plan was reversed, close to or after the delivery. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of all mother-infant dyads (single or twin infants with no known congenital anomalies) who were delivered between 23 0/7 and 24 6/7 weeks gestational age from January 2012 to December 2016. Ninety-nine women met the inclusion criteria − 6 (6%) did not have a care plan available, 85 women (86%) chose for active care and received antenatal steroids (ANS). Six women (6%) who chose comfort care and two women (2%) who chose limited resuscitation during antenatal counseling opted out of the ANS. Two thirds of the women (4/6) who initially opted for comfort care later desired active care, while none of the women who chose active care reversed their decisions. The majorities of the families (94%) had a prenatal care plan in place. Two-thirds (4/6) of the families who opted for comfort care changed their decisions resulting in a missed opportunity for ANS.

Comfort care plan to periviable infants: associated decision reversals and missed opportunity of antenatal steroids