English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This was an observational study on cervical length and head perineum distance and the prediction of time of delivery. One-hundred and twenty-five nulliparous women with uncomplicated, term, singleton pregnancy were recruited when they presented to the labor ward with show or infrequent painful uterine contractions (less than three contractions in ten minutes on a 30 min cardiotocogram). Apart from digital vaginal examination to assess cervical length and dilatation, sonographic cervical length and head perineum distance were measured by two-dimensional ultrasound. We compared women who delivered within 72 h of presentation of labor symptoms, with women who did not. After excluding ten women whose labor was induced and delivered within 72 h of presentation, one hundred and fifteen women were included for final data analysis. Forty-nine women (42.6%) delivered while sixty-six women (57.4%) remained undelivered at 72 h of presentation of symptoms of labor. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups on age, presence of show, contractions, fetal head station and presentation and mode of delivery. For the group who had delivered within 72 h of presentation of labor symptoms, the mean sonographic cervical length was 1.87 cm ± 0.62 cm, while the head perineum distance was 6.01 cm ± 1.15 cm. For the other group, the mean sonographic cervical length was 2.10 cm ± 0.83 cm; head perineum distance was 6.03 cm ± 1.18 cm. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for both sonographic cervical length ( p  = .90); and head perineum distance ( p  = .08). We also compared the cervical length measured by digital vaginal examination versus sonography. The median sonographic measurements were 1.47 cm, 2.11 cm and 2.79 cm at “1 cm,” “2 cm” and “3 cm” digital vaginal measurement, respectively. However, there was extensive overlap between digitally and sonographically measured cervical length. Prediction accuracy of cervical length and head perineum distance was poor. The area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.433 for sonographic cervical length and 0.501 for HPD. Transperineal sonographical assessment of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor was not useful in predicting the time of delivery. However, it can be explored as an alternative assessment method when digital vaginal examination is not preferred.

Sonographic measurement of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor to predict time of delivery