English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study details the importance of medical professionals accurately explaining a diagnosis of preeclampsia to their patients. Self-report data were compared to medical record data. We examined reporting and recall of infant data and maternal health during pregnancy. Reliability between maternal self-report and medical record data was explored in 53 women whose infants had recently been discharged from the nearest Level Three Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Data were collected in a neurodevelopmental follow-up clinic. Maternal reporting of gestational age and infant birth weight was highly accurate ( r  = 0.99,  p  &lt; .0001 and  r  = 0.95,  p  &lt; .0001, respectively), even when controlling for indicators of low socioeconomic status; however, maternal reporting of their own medical diagnoses was weak. There was a discrepancy between the medical records and maternal self-report of preeclampsia ( k  = 0.50). Medical professionals should reiterate to women at postpartum appointments whether or not they had preeclampsia.

the journal of maternal-fetal and neonatal medicine

Mother knows best … except when it comes to a diagnosis of preeclampsia: an exploratory study of the convergence between maternal recall of pregnancy-related outcomes and objective medical data