English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Studies have shown that myeloma cell leukemia-1 (MCL-1) is associated with the prognosis of patients with cancer. To further validate the prognostic value of MCL-1 in cancer, a meta-analysis was conducted. Six databases were searched using Boolean logic search formulas. Data were extracted from the included literature, and pooled odds ratio, hazard ratio, and 95% confidence interval were calculated to determine the relationship between MCL-1 levels and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with cancer. When heterogeneity was found to be significant, a random effects model was used, otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. Twelve articles were included in this meta-analysis, totaling 2208 patients with cancer across 14 studies. A high MCL-1 expression level was associated with patients with high T stage, M stage, and TNM stage in some cancers. Additionally, high MCL-1 expression was likely to be observed in patients with poorly differentiated digestive system tumors and patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Notably, a higher expression of MCL-1 was found to be associated with shorter overall survival in patients with hematological tumors, digestive system tumors, and lung cancer. MCL-1 may be a prognostic biomarker in patients with some types of cancer.

Myeloid cell leukemia-1 as a candidate prognostic biomarker in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis