English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Both sequencing content and fading instructional support are scaffolding techniques designed to make it easier for learners to process information. While sequencing content separates problems into manageable parts before problem-solving, fading of instruction gradually reduces instructional support before problem-solving. Although cognitive load research generally supports the notion that both of these techniques minimise extraneous processing, some research shows that they contribute to an increase in cognitive load under certain circumstances. This study seeks to bridge the gap in the research by examining the relationships that both techniques have with extraneous cognitive load. The results obtained through survey analysis of university students taking online courses show that sequencing content and fading instruction over the course of a semester had a negative relationship with extraneous load. These results are explained against the backdrop of conflicting research, and recommendations are presented to reduce extraneous processing within the learning environment.

How sequencing content and fading instructional support reduce extraneous processing