English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The paper seeks to analyze how the Turkish Constitutional Court has resolved sexual orientation and gender identity cases and constructed the LGBT+ subject in constitutional terms in its initial forays into this controversy-laden issue. It suggests that, although the Court missed a landmark moment for the protection of sexual minorities, the recognition of sexual orientation as a ground of discrimination in the case law of the Court represents an important step as it appears to have opted for proceeding in a piecemeal fashion in recognizing LGBT+ rights.

Missing a landmark moment or treading on thin ice: sexual orientation and gender identity and the Turkish Constitutional Court