English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article considers the ethical dimensions of efforts to develop professional practice with others, informed by literature on the ethics of intervention in education. Data are presented from three studies with workplace teams in early childhood education in Australia and New Zealand that have employed double stimulation within Change Laboratory activities. These data are used to exemplify how the use of double stimulation exposes issues such as agency, power, decision-making, cultural representation, and relationality in the transformation of professional practice. The central claim of the article is that researchers employing double stimulation to develop professional practice need to develop a nuanced understanding of the ethical complexities of formative efforts, both for themselves and for their fellow participants. The article concludes with a series of questions for researchers to consider when intervening in professional practice, including:  Who will likely benefit if we implement the changes we are planning?  and  Who and what is being transformed?

Formative interventions and the ethics of double stimulation for transformative agency in professional practice