English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

As Western societies experience a ‘transition to diversity’ spurred by international migration, an enduring question is how this transition impacts on the nation and its symbolic borders. The article addresses this question by adopting an original analytical lens, what I call the ‘politics of naming’, i.e. the agonistic tensions around naming practices between the majority society and children of migrants. Focusing on the case of Italy, the article identifies three main discursive practices: the embracement by children of migrants of the names ascribed to them by the majority society as a way to claim social visibility and citizenship rights; the rewriting of ascribed social categories (e.g., ‘second generation’) as a way to rewrite the boundaries of national belonging; the rejection of these interpellations for more plural identities. The findings suggest, on the one hand, the persistence of an ethno-racial bias which continues to inform the nation in the age of diversity and, on the other hand, an attempt by the children of migrants to re-imagine the nation along cultural (rather than ethno-racial) lines. It is by more closely attending to this tension that the impact of the transition to diversity on the nation can be revealed.

What’s in a name? Children of migrants, national belonging and the politics of naming