English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Political debate about refugees is heavily influenced by how media images depict them. Centering on the victim/threat dichotomy in relation to the visual construction of the refugee figure, scholarship on media representations of refugees fails to acknowledge the historical layers of how refugees are visually conceptualized. Through scrutiny of historical Finnish media representations of refugees from the late 1930s through to contemporary discussions of asylum-seekers arriving in around 2015, the paper shows that images of refugees and the use of these in political debates go beyond the victim/threat dichotomy. We posit that perceptions as to ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ refugees are linked to historically formed hierarchical notions of habitus and agency underpinned by racial and global-politics-connected motivations. Racialized and global political hierarchies in Western visual arrangements of picturing refugees can be conceptualized as symbolic borders of habitus.

(Not) Looking Like A Refugee Symbolic Borders of Habitus in Media Representations of Refugees