English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aimed to determine whether the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) can serve as a prognostic marker in patients with sepsis. Chinese and English databases were searched to retrieve the included literature. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the bivariate model. Moreover, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI were calculated using the random effect model. Nine articles comprising 3224 patients with sepsis were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled SEN was 0.73 (95% CI 0.65–0.80), the pooled SPE was 0.78 (95% CI 0.69–0.84), the pooled PLR was 3.29 (95% CI 2.15–5.03), the pooled NLR was 0.35 (95% CI 0.24–0.49), and the pooled DOR was 9.50 (95% CI 4.38–20.59). The AUC under the SROC was 0.82 (95% CI 0.78–0.85) for the prognostic meta-analysis. The pooled HR was 1.10 (95% CI 1.02–1.18). This meta-analysis suggests that a high CAR level is associated with increased mortality and a poor prognosis.

The prognostic value of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis