English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Drawing upon research into relative leader–member exchange (LMX) and social identity approaches to leadership, this study explores how congruence in the LMX quality of individuals and their teammates affects the team identification of those individuals. This, in turn, influences individuals’ job performance. Results of polynomial regressions on 575 dyads support the congruence hypothesis. Further, we find asymmetrical incongruence effects in which individuals have lower team identification and poorer job performance when their LMX is lower in quality than their teammates compared to the opposite situation. These findings emphasize the pivotal role played by leaders and teammates in promoting employee team identification at work.

A self-categorization perspective on individual-teammates congruence in leader-member exchange quality and individual performance