English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

From the actor-centric perspective of party politics, it is widely held that the two transitional outcomes observed in Tunisia and Egypt are the result of the different degree of polarization across the two party systems. Through a quantitative text analysis of the party manifestos of the main transitional parties in Tunisia and Egypt, this contribution shows that the end result of the two transitional experiences has actually little to do with polarization and it is rather due to the way political parties structured political competition during the founding elections.

The ‘myth of moderation’ following the Arab Uprisings: polarization in Tunisia and Egypt’s founding elections