English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Iranian and Russian intellectual traditions reveal a similar discursive genealogy in relation to Western modernity. Differing in social context, historical periodization, goals, methods and scope of inquiry, Iranian and Russian political debate reflects fascinating parallels, some of which prevail today. The debate over orientation reflects contemporary Iran and Russia’s deep-rooted ambivalence towards Western norms and institutions. This study delves deeper into this dilemma by revealing that both countries are heirs to a similar intellectual heritage that casts the West in a binary: as either a model or as an anti-model. In the case of Iran, this took form in the ‘Westoxication’ narrative that developed as a counter-discourse to the early twentieth-century debate that drew on Western liberal principles, and in the case of Russia, it manifested in the Slavophile-Westernizer controversy. Both intellectual debates were embedded in a complex exercise of self-reflection, with psychological, historiographic and religio-cultural dimensions that ultimately revealed a pattern that illuminates the contemporary dilemma that persists in both countries.

Parallel Discursive Fields in Pre-Revolutionary Russia and Iran: The West as a Model or an Anti-Model