English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study investigates the effects of corporate social advocacy (CSA) in mitigating public skepticism of corporate social engagement and reveals how CSA helps build relationships with publics. Ambiguity embedded in general corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities can cause public skepticism, but this study argues that corporations can signal their sincerity by engaging in CSA practices by taking a definitive stance on controversial socio-political issues. The results of an online survey (N = 960) showed that a corporation’s clear identification with a controversial social issue is positively associated with brand trust and loyalty mediated by reduced skepticism of corporate non-market activities. The findings of this study have practical implications for corporations as they attempt to optimize the effects of public communication through social engagement.

The mediating role of skepticism: how corporate social advocacy builds quality relationships with publics