English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We explore the relationship between US bank claims and European bank claims on Emerging Market Economies (EMEs) and the level of shadow banking assets in 11 major EMEs over the 18-year period spanning 2002–2019. By using a fixed-effects panel model, we find that cross-border bank flows from US banks and European banks have different effects on shadow banking assets in EMEs. Whereas US bank claims on EMEs have a positive impact on the level of shadow banking assets in EMEs, European bank claims on EMEs are significantly negatively related to the level of shadow banking in EMEs.

The US vs. the EU: cross-border bank flows’ origin factor and shadow banking in emerging market economies